editors speak
APPLESEEDS
Susan Buckley, editor
By Jan Fields
This month we’re chatting with Susan Buckley, the editor of
APPLESEEDS, a social studies magazine for third and fourth grade
students. APPLESEEDS relies heavily on good freelance nonfiction and is
part of the Cobblestone family of magazines.
KMW: Thank you for chatting with us. Since APPLESEEDS takes a summer
break, I assume schools make a major portion of the subscribers. Do you
find that homeschoolers also make up a size-able number? Do your themes
reflect your connection with schools?
SB: Yes, schools and school libraries are a major subscriber base.
Homeschoolers are an important group of subscribers, but I don't have a
sense of what proportion they make up. (The main offices at Cobblestone
might have that data.) Given our audience, we pay careful attention to
themes that elementary teachers would find useful in the classroom and
that elementary students would find appealing.
KMW: I know APPLESEEDS uses very little fiction. In the Industrial
Revolution issue (which I have before me) I see a piece called "Life in
a Boarding House" which is written in first person, present tense so
it's clearly fiction. It outlines a day in the life of a mill girl. Is
that generally the sort of fiction you take -- more informative, less
plot-linked?
SB: APPLESEEDS is primarily a nonfiction magazine. Fiction, poetry and
retellings of folktales appear in the Reading Corner, as does occasional
original fiction. We do also include what I call "creative
nonfiction"--stories such as the “Life in a Boarding House" in which the
writer takes on the role of a person in history. Although the focus of
such pieces is essentially nonfiction content, the information is
presented in a fictional style.
KMW: Do you prefer your crafts be period-true? I see in the
Industrial Revolution issue, you have a homemade spindle which would
certainly be related to the period but it's made from a CD -- a definite
technological wonder -- are you pretty comfortable with that blending of
old and new?
SB: The Fun Stuff features, in which students do craft projects, cook,
and the like vary widely. The essential requirements are that they
relate closely to the theme, are safe to do, and that kids will have fun
in the process.
KMW: I see a strong focus on making history relevant for today's
reader throughout this Industrial Revolution issue -- not only comparing
past and present in the articles about the Industrial Revolution but
also specific looks around today's world such as the article looking at
the items we use today that began in the Industrial Revolution. Also the
article on today's technological changes. Is this part of all the
issues? Do writers need to keep this in mind during the query stage --
how might they assure you that they intend to bring that relevancy to
the article?
SB: Making history relevant, engaging, and accessible is key to
APPLESEEDS' philosophy.
KMW: What kind of interactive content do you like best -- crafts?
recipes? puzzles? Are there any types you would like to see more of?
SB: All of the above!
KMW: How open are you to queries from less experienced writers? What
would you look for in a query from such a writer? How might newer
writers convince you of the quality of their scholarship?
SB: We are very open to working with new writers, but judge their
queries with a more critical eye than we might apply to one from an
experienced writer, especially one from an experienced writer whom we've
worked with in the past. If the query is well expressed and fully
developed, we would be willing to give a new writer a chance,
particularly if the query is an imaginative one. If the query is cursory
and/or not well written, we would not take a chance.
KMW: Should a query contain information about photo sources or does
APPLESEEDS prefer to track down their own photos?
SB: Information on photo sources is not required but IF the writer has
knowledge of available photos or IF the article is a photo essay or the
like, then information on photos should be part of the query. We do do
our own photo research but find it very helpful to have ideas and
information from writers. This is more relevant to actual assignments
than to the query process, however.
KMW: What do you see too much of in queries you receive? What would
you like to see more of?
SB: We receive a wonderfully large number of excellent queries for most
of our issues. A small proportion come in as a two or three line idea
(and these are almost always rejected), but most are very well conceived
and the ideas are thoughtfully developed.
As an additional note, in this electronic age, we MUCH prefer receiving
queries via email. Simplest for us,
too, is to have the query in the body of the email rather than sent as
an attachment. Themes for the 06-07 year (!) have not yet been posted,
but should be available on the
website
within the next month.

This page last updated on 01 September 2005
|